Former TDP minister Ayyanna Patrudu got a huge relief in the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The HC has given a key judgment that Section 467, which carries a punishment of over ten years, is not applicable in this case.
The court said that it has come to this decision after examining the basic aspects. The High Court clarified that the NOC given by the officials of the Water Resources Department does not come under the definition of valuable documents. The CID has been directed to follow the guidelines given by the Supreme Court in the Arnesh Kumar case.
The High Court ordered to issue notices to Ayyanna Patrudu under 41A of CrPC and said that a CID inquiry can be held.
The eagerly awaited social drama Kubera, directed by the renowned Sekhar Kammula, is creating a…
Siddu Jonnalagadda’s ‘Tillu’ franchise has become a sensation, with the titular character gaining a dedicated…
The makers of Hari Hara Veera Mallu unveiled the teaser of the film today and…
In Tollywood film industry, the bond between director S.S. Rajamouli and actor Jr. NTR, fondly…
Anand Devarakonda is riding the wave of success from his recent film “Baby.” This coming-of-age…
There is a whole lot of emphasis on encouraging fresh talent in the Telugu film…